Saving the World One Good Intention at a Time

by J-Me Photography

by J-Me Photography

Last week I downloaded a virus. Congratulations, Dora! I spent hours doing my best to rid the computer of the nasty bug and playing with settings I didn’t understand. Patrick spent even more hours doing his best to rid the computer of the virus and figuring out what exactly I had messed with and attempting to put that back in order. Our friend and computer savior came to save the day on Saturday, but the computer is still not completely at peace. What a mess. Of course I feel awful for the innocent mistake that has wreaked such havoc and wasted hours. But what keeps running through my head is – why would someone write something like that just to hurt someone?

As we sat with our computer-expert friend waiting for certain programs to do their cleaning jobs, I interviewed him as to why people write viruses. This time around we had only been inconvenienced; no real harm had been done. But some of these programs are meant to hurt. According to our friend there are three main reasons for writing harmful computer programs (viruses, Trojans, and who else knows what they’re called): somebody is gathering information in the hopes of providing you or me advertising for products we would be drawn to. The virus-thing I downloaded falls into this category. Eventually we would have been swamped with advertisements of products that might, but most likely would not, be interesting for us.

The second type is searching specifically for bank information and passwords in order to, if all goes well, clean out your bank account. Or to in some other illegal manner accumulate money that belongs to someone else. These nasty guys could really do some damage.

Finally the third reason is simply taking on the adventure of seeing how far one can get with his computer savvy. It’s the challenge of breaking into governmental and top-secret agencies and quite possibly going on to make some money, also in an illegal fashion. To say these types are dangerous is a minor understatement.

Okay so maybe my initial question wasn’t quite fair: the people writing these things probably aren’t doing it with the sole intention of hurting someone else. But it obviously won’t come as a surprise to them when collateral damage is done on the way to their goal, mainly to advance themselves either financially or egoistically.

We know these guys are only looking after themselves. But what about a guy like Edward Snowden? To some he is a whistle-blower and traitor and to others he is a whistle-blower and hero. However you see him, he claims his intentions are good. As opposed to these computer programmers who are thinking first and foremost about themselves, Snowden says he wants to make these top-secret documents public because he believes the people have a right to know what is going on behind-the-scenes. He has sacrificed his relationship to his home country and his way of life for what he believes to be the good of others.

The good of others – Who decides what is good? And if something is right or good for me does it automatically mean the same for you? Good intentions do not inherently give rise to wise decisions. Do good intentions alone validate the actions that follow?

Years ago I rode a wobbly bike with three gears, only one of which worked. Thinking of the man who was responsible for fixing bikes and not wanting to add to his load, I continued riding the bike, content with the one gear. Soon after making my decision, the man discovered on his own that the bike needed repairing and was annoyed I didn’t come directly to him. I was accused by someone close to the repairman of being selfish, only thinking of myself and not the person who would ride the bike after me. I was deeply hurt, cut by the accusation of selfishness because I knew indeed I am so often selfish, but this time, this time I chose differently. Not only had I most likely not made the best decision although I had the good of someone else in mind, my good intentions had been misunderstood.

Even when we all know at least in part answers to my theoretical questions above, I wonder if good intentions and the actions resulting aren’t easier to forgive. It seems every time I turn on the news, I see people in positions of power thinking only of themselves. Of course most of those individuals would deny these intentions, might have even successfully suppressed such thoughts or somehow twisted them into pleasant words, but I see them clinging to the power they have, going to any measure necessary to retain it. Like the virus-writers these people in power know collateral damage will happen – even death and desolation – but that does not matter. What’s most important to them is they keep what they have.

If good intentions will most likely be misguided, wouldn’t it be easier to identify ourselves with the computer virus programmers and power-hungry? Probably. But the thought of all that death and destruction in the way of collateral damage just seems a bit too dramatic for me. And I find all those self-furthering individuals revolting. It’s certainly not easy, but putting the good of others first, even if sometimes misguided, could save a lot of grief. I think I’ll stick to my good intentions, even if they turn out to be the wrong ones.


About doralynelle

A would-be writer, stay-at-home mother of three, I find joy in the smallest things, love to laugh and can be super grumpy. Reading, writing, yoga and running are my favorite free-time activites, although enjoying a nice red wine is pretty high on the list too. Living in Germany as an American gives me lots to think about and certaintly to write about.
This entry was posted in Life Questions and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Saving the World One Good Intention at a Time

  1. Jolene says:

    It would be interesting to have a statistic about what percentage of the time our good intentions end up having the opposite of their intended effect on others. 10%? More? (Hopefully not!) Less? (I wouldn’t count on it!) Maybe the key for those times when things don’t go over so well is to be able to communicate those good intentions, but also not be overly surprised when they come acrosss differntly to others. Trying to see from the other’s perspective. Easier said than done. And what about all of those emotional responses? (How dare he/she be so upset with me?) Kind of hard to just logically hold them at bay. And if we could, would we run the risk of seeing ourselves as being morally superior?

    • doralynelle says:

      Exactly. In the end the topic brings more questions than answers, although for most of us it’s clear we need to strive to think of others before ourselves. As you said, it’s never easy though. Your point about trying to see something from someone else’s perspective is also a great tip. Also not easy, but does help bring things into perspective sometimes. Maybe our good intentions will, in the end, leave a more positive impact than a negative!

  2. Jolene says:

    I’m not quite done with this one yet. When I read your blog, I thought that your conclusion seemed obvious. Of course we will stick to our good intentions! Isn’t that obvious? And then I remembered a conversation that I had with a good friend, H. Rauch, about 15 years ago. I’ll take the liberty of quoting, “…to do anything truly good is- to my knowledge- impossible. I’ve two broken legs and a torn shirt and am supposed to climb Everest. But to do evil is a cakewalk. This would be too daunting except for (several) things 1) I’ve seen those who’ve given up: I will not go the same way. 2) I believe it’s right and good to try, even if your trying is an offence, vou’ve got to start somewhere. God has made truth, beauty and goodness, and something is required from us by their very nature… How do we know that the Spirit of God is with us?…Because of those things which we are beginning to do which are not in our nature…” So it is less about our good intentions being misunderstood by others, and more about their imperfection, their messiness. And so, yes, you nailed it. Even if our trying is an offence, you’ve got to start somewhere.

  3. doralynelle says:

    Oh this is so beautiful! Yes, in its essence this is what I was trying to say, but Mr. Rauch said it so much more eloquently! I could requote the whole thing as I try to make a point about what I love most, but that would be a bit redundant, so I’ll leave it at this: thank you so much for sharing!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s